Tümü
← Back to Squawk list
Boeing 787 source code leak exposes deep security flaws
At the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas, security researcher Ruben Santamarta claims that leaked code has led him to something unprecedented: security flaws in one of the 787 Dreamliner's components, deep in the plane's multi-tiered network. In a statement, Boeing said it had investigated IOActive's claims and concluded that they don't represent any real threat of a cyberattack. (www.wired.com) Daha Fazlası...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Sadly being stupid does not render right wing but hurt fascists incapable of typing. Boeing has wasted $30 billion since they decided there is nothing worthwhile about Boeing engineers and tried to contact all their work out to cheap vendors.
[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]
Why do you read it if it bothers you so much? It never ceases to amaze me how so many right-wingers love to look for and roll around in the things they say offends them. I'd call you a masochist but I seriously doubt you'd understand what it means, even if someone read the definition to you.
WTH are you yakking about...this was brought up over 10 yrs ago, and the FAA even issued "special conditions" regulations with respect to the Dreamliner.
Maybe it's about time you, and others like you, take off you damn "left and right" turn blinders and realize there is also a straight section!!
Maybe it's about time you, and others like you, take off you damn "left and right" turn blinders and realize there is also a straight section!!
I get the impression that you’ve picked a side.
Boeing had its own engineers try to hack the system? The same engineers who wrote the code that Santamarta says is vulnerable? Gee, no vested interest there. They're unlikely to admit to Boeing that they screwed up and even if they did, Boeing isn't going to admit it to a reporter -- or anyone else. Calling the investigator "irresponsible" is just a red herring to try to deflect attention away from the problem. Only Donny Quixote would claim Boeing doesn't have a credibility problem and he's a fool.
*sigh*
No, Boeing (as well as other OEMs) use external firms/entities for testing. This is a basic principle for aviation engineering - engineers can not sign-off on their own work. Read ARP4754A and ARP4761 for starters.
The Wired article is riddled with inaccuracies based on a presentation made by someone that has a poor understanding of the aviation industry and tried to draw parallels - where none can be drawn - to the consumer electronics industry.
No, Boeing (as well as other OEMs) use external firms/entities for testing. This is a basic principle for aviation engineering - engineers can not sign-off on their own work. Read ARP4754A and ARP4761 for starters.
The Wired article is riddled with inaccuracies based on a presentation made by someone that has a poor understanding of the aviation industry and tried to draw parallels - where none can be drawn - to the consumer electronics industry.
So where was your 100% accurate article published? Or do you just specialise in criticising published reports without ever doing any of the work yourself?
Hint: The former pays a lot better than the latter.
Hint: The former pays a lot better than the latter.